Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimmer Coppejans vs Dragos Nicolae Madaras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Coppejans vs Madaras analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmer Coppejans vs Dragos Nicolae Madaras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coppejans has won 48.21% of points on his second serve, while Madaras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coppejans, in recent form, has won 53.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Madaras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.18% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coppejans has saved 64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Madaras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coppejans has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 19/ 18), with Madaras winning 66.67% (W/L 20/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Madaras has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 295/ 139), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10), where as Madaras has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 93.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Coppejans winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Madaras winning 0. The last match between Coppejans and Madaras was at the San Marino Challenger, 01-08-2023, First, Clay with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Coppejans and Madaras have played a deciding set 0 times, with Coppejans winning 0 times and Madaras 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Coppejans winning 0, and Madaras 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.76 while Madaras has played against players with an average rank of 230.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coppejans has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Madaras has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coppejans has converted 22.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Madaras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Madaras
254
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
378
Rank
191
High
26
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
57% (418-314)
Career Total W/L
66% (324-165)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$294,830
Career Prize Money
$42,460
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Dragos Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:29 | 1:40:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (29/58) | 55% (37/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (20/29) | 59% (22/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (32/67) | 40% (23/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Dragos Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.5 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (174/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (125/174) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (54/112) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 23% (8/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (119/327) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Dragos Nicolae Madaras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Marco Cecchinato
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Sebastian Gima
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Coppejans Vs Madaras Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
